Timeline for Should we add a "not mainstream science" close reason?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/ with https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.earthscience.stackexchange.com/ with https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 15, 2015 at 9:02 | comment | added | Jan Doggen | The question is deleted again. | |
| Dec 1, 2015 at 6:40 | comment | added | f.thorpe Mod | Personally I think the title itself is a legitimate question, but the scope of the question is too broad : "Would Atmosphere and life survive?". Once he has the answer to "how would the atmosphere change", then he could ask if life could exist in that atmosphere (e.g. in a different post... but it would need to be much more specific about what type of life). Guess that's a long winded way of saying I would not vote to reopen as it is currently worded. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 13:52 | comment | added | casey Mod | @Aabaakawad it was auto-deleted. I've undeleted it so now you can see/edit/cast a reopen vote on it if you'd like. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 4:47 | comment | added | Eubie Drew | @casey I am getting a 404, page not found, when trying to get to it. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 3:40 | comment | added | casey Mod | I agree that the Q in that title is legitimate and the way it is currently worded is probably acceptable. The presentation the led to the closing was a different case and as is stands now I would support reopening it if It gained at least a couple reopen votes from the community. | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 16:56 | comment | added | gerrit Mod | I think there may be many cases where it can be debatable whether or not something is mainstream science. Climate scientists like to test their climate models on peculiar input scenarios, for example. | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 16:22 | history | answered | Eubie Drew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |