4
$\begingroup$

A comment by plannapus suggested that might be a useful tag for the question. (I had thought of "field-methods", but "field-technique" has a more technical feel.)

Would be a useful tag and is that the best name for the category?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ +1 Clearly, all my opinion, but field-work might be a more general tag, and as a result, be more useful. rock-identification appears to merit its own tag, and it is unlikely in my opinion that someone looking to find or tag a question related to rock identification would look for field related tags. $\endgroup$ – blunders Jun 6 '14 at 13:58
  • $\begingroup$ @blunders Why not make that an answer, allowing people to downvote if they disagree. This is Meta, so receiving downvotes is not nearly as painful (and giving them has no reputation cost even for answers). $\endgroup$ – Paul A. Clayton Jun 6 '14 at 14:51
6
$\begingroup$

might be a more general tag than either "field-methods", but "field-technique" - and as a result, may be more useful.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

appears to merit its own tag, and it is unlikely in my opinion that someone looking to find or tag a question related to rock identification would look for field related tags.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .