8
$\begingroup$

Do we prefer tags like this:

  • volcanology
  • speleology
  • glaciology

or like this:

  • volcanoes
  • caves
  • glaciers

?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Well glaciers are synonymous with glaciology but a small part o fthe field so it is a bad example. $\endgroup$ – Peter Jansson Apr 16 '14 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ Are those going to be synonymous? I imagine pretty much all question tagged with "volcanoes" could equally well be tagged "volcanology". But some some questions about speleology might be more focussed on how to do the science (e.g. caving), rather than on the caves themselves. I would suggest using both sets of tags, and if it later becomes obvious that there is no meaningful distinction for the questions on this site, then make them synonyms and/or merge them. $\endgroup$ – naught101 Apr 20 '14 at 5:49
7
$\begingroup$

I'm tempted to say the latter. This is (hopefully) a multidisciplinary site, and if I'm asking a question I may not know exactly what field it falls under... but I do know what physical feature I'm talking about.

Some physical features are relevant to multiple disciplines (e.g. glaciers might be relevant to geologists, climate scientists, oceanographers...) but I see that as a positive, encouraging serendipitous discoveries of cross-discipline questions that one might not otherwise spot.

I don't feel this very strongly, though, and I'm tempted to say "Wait a bit, see what naturally developers, then take a view and clean up" ;-)

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ With that in mind, both sets of tags may eventually become relevant. The latter set for questions such as the example you gave, and the former set for questions specifically about the disciplines. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage Apr 16 '14 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ I like this answer -- disciplines are one level more abstract than physical places or features. "Is this question about glaciers?" usually makes more sense than "Is this question about glaciology?" $\endgroup$ – foobarbecue Apr 16 '14 at 17:03
6
$\begingroup$

I'm going to propose tags should follow the former spec:

  • volcanology (synonym vulcanology)
  • speleology
  • glaciology

I love that this site aspires to be an expert site. Don't be afraid of using grown-up expert tags, rather than kiddy-talk.

If you want a community of experts, then use that language, particularly in tags. By all means write accessibly. Technical language has the advantage of precision and a body of shared understanding about its meaning. Lay language (such as "caves") is messy, smeary, bleared and usually ambiguous.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I see what you're saying, but I disagree that jargon is intrinsically good. Big words can be invented unnecessarily and defined vaguely. $\endgroup$ – foobarbecue Apr 16 '14 at 18:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Biology.se, chemistry.se and physics.se chose indeed to use the disciplines as tags and not the object of the discipline, and i do think we should as well. $\endgroup$ – plannapus Apr 25 '14 at 14:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .