I have deleted identification-request tag and added missing tags as mineralogy, petrology or sedimentology from questions that are related with **field or theorical geology** ([example][1]). Also questions about clouds and meteorology instrumentation to facilitate the deletion task.

Then if a "ban" is applied to every question that has the tag those questions will be saved (I still don't understand how is gonna this be solved).
 
For all questions related with fossils I started to do it, but I was told not to do it from other reviewers. There are still only 3 questions of fossils taged id-request. The total amount of question asking for identify a fossil can round 30, no more. I have sugested their edition to place them where the rest of fossils question are.

I completed the review. 

The result is:

 1. **Questions retaged deleting id-request tag** (~60)
 2. **Questions taged with identification-request** (391):

  

 - Questions asking to identify his mineral or rock (388, [we are closing everyone][2], will be done in some days).
 - A few questions about fossils (3). ([Are fossils questions going to be deleted too?][3])

My sugest is to retag the only 3 questions that are not id-my-rock/mineral (and delete the word rock from title) to leave the list clean of questions we don't want to delete, but as you wish, I sugested the edit as I did before being prompted:

https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/9272/i-have-found-this-fossil-tooth-could-it-be-pliosaur-or-maybe-theropod

https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/5415/fossil-or-beef-limestone

https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/12542/what-type-of-fossil-is-present-in-this-rock-from-northern-ohio

I am for accepting fossils questions, but if you wish not to, you can see the rest of questions asking to identify a fossil on fossils tag, that has only 60 question in total. It does not represent a traffic trouble and fossils can be very commonly identified from morphology are my reasons.

I hoppe it is correct with the thougths of the community, facilitating the deletion task (and the process of including the tag in a black list, if it is done). 

ps: @Gimelist and @Semidiurnal Simon. Today a good new. I typed "identify my rock" and we are no longer the first entrance. [The first is now USGS][4], where it is adviced what we should have adviced some time ago: 

> "Rocks and minerals are extremely difficult to identify through
> photographs. You will get the best results by taking your rock or
> mineral to a local source where it can be handled and examined
> closely. Possibilities include:
> 
>  - Your state geological survey 
>  - A natural science museum
>  - A college or university with a geology department
>  - A rockshop Members of a local Gem & Mineral club or Rockhunting    club (many hobbyists are experts at identification)
>  - Vendors at a Gem & Mineral show"


  [1]: https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/13716/what-are-the-cubic-formations-found-inside-larimar-gemstones
  [2]: https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1785/asking-for-help-to-500-rep-users-to-close-id-request-questions
  [3]: https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1781/shark-tooth-id-question-on-topic
  [4]: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-identify-my-rock-or-mineral?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products